Started good. Then got weird and made up. Then very drawn out. Then kinda of a weird attempt at humor? Idk

Liked the idea tho

I think Garius’ inner thoughts might be the best part of this story XD

Weird place for this chapter

Wooooo saved some extras on Eden Prime very nice!

It is curious, if she is as reckless as they say, how can she be in command and waste so many lives

I know that there 65 more chapters after this one, but I’m really hoping you don’t kill off Tetrimus. He’s so cool...

a well-thought-out au bettering the original in narrative cohesion and pretty fun to read

Milk, for the Khorneflakes!

Wow, just re-read this 6 years after completion.
It's still excellent. Comparable to David Weber or Eric Flint.

Now can you do more on 'That which cannot die'?

(Posted as anon due to reviewing many years ago...)

"Your so called PM." (which I can't read because you blocked me)

Yo zekses you ok? I’m concerned.

When hundreds of thousands of people die in US because of your attitude towards inconveniencing infected people coming from Europe by forcing them into a quarantine to prevent the spread of the COVID infection, know that YOU and your ilk in particular are the ones to blame. You write good fics, but your attitude towards freedoms in times of crisis is criminal! You can ban me from discord for expressing concern over wellbeing of people endangered by your kind, but you cannot silence me.

New York is happening in part because people like you wanted your freedoms and refused to enforce stricter measures over international travels, these lives are on your conscience.

I've read this story several times over now, along with the sequels and some of your documentation. I've fallen in love with this universe you've built from the pieces left by bioware. You've taught me a lot of stuff through your story that i can feel comes from real experience from what you've endured. Know that you have people that, like me, love your work, both from the soul it has developed on it's own thanks to you and from the staggering amount of detail you and the Editing Gang have put into this world, that even though you keep saying it's grimdark and stuff, has helped me find some hope to keep going when i had none. I'm in a better place mentally, and it's in no small part thanks to you.

So I have made it to Chapter 35. I have heard a lot of amazing things about this story, but this is about as far as I can go.

You have done an incredible amount of world building. That, and the politics, have been my favorite aspects of this story thus far. I loved the retake on major character introductions, especially Tali's, and I am even enjoying some of the OCs, like Cole.

However, there are a few inconsistencies that make me feel like I'm running smack-dab into a wall. Namely, Shepard and the contradictions between her personality and behaviors. Throughout this story, Shepard is described as "a monster" who has trouble connecting and communicating with people. So far, I haven't seen any hint of that. Your Shepard is extremely verbal, overly open with her emotions, and cognizant of her perceived flaws (which is strange to find in even high-functioning individuals). She comforts Ashley, Tali, and Liara (within moments of meeting two of them), socially bonds with Cole and Joker, chummies around with Garrus and Wrex, and remains unerringly polite with the Council. Her self-deprecation comes across as seeking attention, especially with Chakwas, and not tugging-at-the-heartstrings. She has had no panic attacks, social blunders, anger management problems, or suicidal behaviors. Oh, they have mentioned and talked about and analyzed verbally by the characters, but behaviorally, Shepard hasn't demonstrated any of that. If anything, she comes across as slightly autistic. Which would be fine, expect that clearly isn't your goal here.

Then there are the battle scenes. Some are good. Tali's debacle at the Citadel easily comes to mind. The struggle felt real! Even though I knew the ultimate outcome, I was still biting my nails at the tension. But others make me want to pull out the rule of "Equal Opportunity Awesomeness," in which each character has a moment of being awesome or brings something important to the fight. A good example of this is early this chapter, when the hoppers tackle Shepard, dog pile Wrex, and trap Garrus in the elevator. A bad example of this, again in this chapter, is Shepard, Wrex, and Garrus all being taken out in one hit and Liara going biotic badass. I know your thought process was to turn Liara's damsel-in-distress trope on its head, but in the process Shepard became the damsel-in-distress (and Garrus and Wrex faded into the background as unimportant).

There is also a lack of consistency in power or fighting prowess. At Eden Prime, Shepard takes on 70 geth (this battle is also another bad example of EOA, because Kaiden and Ashley just stand around with their mouths hanging open, contributing nothing). Yet here, she gets one shotted by a krogan biotic. Why? It feels too contrived, like a set up to make Liara look good (speaking of which, after two days without food or water and suspended in that stress position, Liara wouldn't have been able to walk at all. That particular stress position the game puts her in is actually used to torture and break prisoners. She REALLY wouldn't be mobile, and it's doubtful that she'd be able to talk even at that level of dehydration).

Anyway, you are a great writer. I hope some of these recommendations can help you become an even better one.

We are already in the second chapter and, right from the gate, you make your Shepard distinct from both canon and other fanon (or at least those that I have read) from her introduction- by showcasing her willingness to kill a child. And to do so in a manner to cause one last emotional distress to the mother.

Granted, I am aware she later felt guilty about it. Granted, it is a almost certain mercy kill, given the context. Granted, it makes sense that she would do so in a manner to cause emotional turmoil to her mother given her past. Granted you pretty clearly do kill, or cause the death of, children in canon (the Arrival dlc, depending on how you resolve Krogan/Quarian crises in 3)...though, as a counterargument to that, you do not do so on screen and its mostly implied collateral to a difficult decision, rather than a deliberate act.

However, it is still incredibly distinct from all other portrayals that I have seen thus far, and a good opening salvo to your premise- that this is far more bloodthirsty and grimdark version of even the fanfic Renegade Reinterpretations, which itself was far more grimdark and bloodthirsty than canon.
Other than that reading up on the boarding action, infantry tactics and deployment of the nano-agent (which is curiously ill-represented in canon) was fun. Overall another enjoyable chapter.

However, your chapter actually made me ponder a philosophical question that applies to both corruption and AU based storylines and that is how to potray core characteristics across different timelines? What are 'core characteristics'? How many 'core characteristics' does a given AU Character have to have to remain a clear alteration of the Original character rather than 'just some dude that happens to look like the Original character"?

Since that sounds confusing I will give an example and explain- Batman.

I think Batman is a man who most would define with the following characteristics -Rich aloof billionaire-Mastery of gadgets/technology-No superpowers-Extreme training and discipline-Believer in Justice-Master planner-Though shall not kill!

Yet, in a recent storyline, Batman did encounter alternate versions of himself that subverted several of those characteristics. There were Doomsday/Aquaman/GL/Cyborg/Flash variants that all had powers and, with the obvious exception of the cyborg variant, did not use much technology. The GL variant came across as petulant and undisciplined. And of course all were perfectly willing to kill.
Really, the only characteristic universal among all was planning/scheming personality, though even there the Doomsday variant did not seem to use it much. The one who was most akin to the OG Batman was probably Batman-Who-Laughs and the Grim Knight, both of whom pretty only do away with the 'Thou-Shall-Not-Kill" motif ...and heavily so. (well...the BWL also does not care about even a perverted version of justice)

Would you consider these to be 'legitimate' alternate interpretations of the original Batman, or have several of them deviated enough to where they are unrecognizable as even alt-evil corrupt versions of Batman. How many deviations from these core characteristics would have to occur to where you would not consider a given Batman (or insert given character here) a recognizable alteration to the canon character(CC), and instead of an entirely distinct OC who just happens to have some similar backgrounds/looks to the CC?

On a humorous extreme, would consider a hypothetical Salarian culture that looked and acted like 40k Orks with all their warmongering and scrappy tech to still be Salarians or just 'Skinny-Grey Orks"?

I emphasize this isn't a criticism of you or your Shepard, especially since the latter benefits from a wide variety of potential alterations even in canon, but rather an ask about your philosophy since, from your website, you like to detail out said philosophy!